The following information has been kindly supplied by
Peter
O'Loughlin, The Eden Lodge Practice
www.edenlodgepractice.com
Alcohol misuse
and anxiety based presenting problems.
Given that
anxiety disorders are among the most common of presenting
problems, it may be of interest to practitioners to be aware of
how alcohol misuse can cause or aggravate such conditions. Such
an understanding may provide insight as to why some anxiety
based problems seem to be more difficult to resolve.
Many of us have
discovered for ourselves how a drink or two seems to dispel
anxiety. Generally speaking this occurrence is not uncommon for
those who feel nervous or uncomfortable in some type of social
settings. A couple of drinks appear to be the perfect antidote,
inducing feelings of relaxation and in some cases mild euphoria.
Since these feelings in turn generate a sense of confidence,
and, in some cases, seem to enhance our eloquence, it is hardly
surprising that many start to ‘self medicate’. Alas! Like so
many other psychoactive drugs, sooner or later, sometimes too
late, the discovery is made that increased quantities are
required in order to obtain the same effect. Thus it is not
uncommon for people to find themselves drinking more to ease
their anxiety, without realizing that one of the many paradoxes
of alcohol is that although it initially appears to alleviate
anxiety, regular and long term use actually increases anxiety
levels. (1)
There are widely
differing views on whether it is anxiety that causes alcohol
misuse, or abuse that causes anxiety. What has been established
is that alcohol abuse can and does cause the following
conditions:
Depression. Anxiety. Suicide Ideation Phobic
Disorders. Memory Loss/Blanks. Panic Attacks. Hallucinations.
Delusions.
(2)
It is not
intended to imply that everyone who abuses or becomes dependent
on alcohol experience all of the above. Alcoholism is a complex
disease affecting different people in differing ways. However
because in its nature it is a progressive disease, continued
abuse, will in time, allow any or all of the disorders to become
more acute.
Where one
or more of the conditions listed above co-exists together with
alcohol misuse we have a condition that is referred to as
comorbidity. (3) (This
condition is sometimes referred to as Dual-Dependency.)
As may be assumed
there are also medical and behavioral complications that can
arise, and although some of these respond well to therapeutic
intervention, it is not the intention of this article to address
such issues.
Research has
shown that people with anxiety disorders report that apart from
seeking to avoid anxiety inducing situations, the use of
alcohol is a primary method of coping. We also need to consider
the probability that positive expectancy, or belief,
by a client, that alcohol, regardless of all the evidence to the
contrary, relieves anxiety. Therefore people with anxiety
disorders may drink excessively because they believe that in so
doing their anxiety levels will diminish. Once again such
expectancy or belief is re-enforced but usually with increasing
amounts of alcohol, thus rendering a client vulnerable to
addiction and comorbidity.
It is only in the
last decade that the condition of comorbidity has been
identified and recognized, and even more recently since the
importance of treating alcohol related mental disorders
simultaneously has been acknowledged. Unfortunately it is
regrettable to note that many therapists and agencies are still
reluctant to acquire the necessary knowledge to effectively
assess for the existence of comorbidity. Indeed as far as I’m
aware the major training organizations in both Psycho &
Hypnotherapy fail to include even the basic facts and affects of
substance misuse and dependency in their syllabus. Given the
documented psychological problems that such misuse either
aggravates or induces, together with escalating presenting of
such problems, it is to be hoped that the more enlightened
training organisations will seek to address and rectify this
omission.
For those who may think I’m being unduly alarmist
about a condition that seems to be rare or obscure, the
available evidence for the existence of comorbidity indicates
that up to 75% of those who misuse alcohol may be so affected.
(4) Earlier evidence in support of this emerges from Canada (5)
wherein it is suggested that 17% of those who misuse alcohol
suffer from severe depression. 16% experience significant
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) and a staggering 26% Phobic
Disorders.
Those statistics
begs the question of how many of those presenting with anxiety
based disorders are misusing alcohol. Lack of research based
evidence prevents accurate indications, however based on the
available information; one conservative extrapolation indicates
it is approximately one third.
The importance of
assessing for alcohol misuse when presented with anxiety based
disorders, has until comparatively recently been overlooked.
This is not surprising when we consider that the vast majority
of GPs appear to lack the resources to routinely screen
for the presence of alcohol misuse. (6)
The authors concluded that throughout the UK 20%
of all patients presenting to GPs consume alcohol at excessive
levels, yet 98% of these are not identified in the general
practice setting.
Readers may wish to draw their own conclusions as to how, under
such circumstances, the scope this leaves for inappropriate
and/or inadequate treatment protocols.
If that is the
case in Primary Care one cannot help wondering what would be
revealed if such extensive research were carried out among those
who offer therapeutic intervention for anxiety based disorders.
Unfortunately, although no such research has been carried out it
is a matter of fact that many of the people who work in such
settings have little or no knowledge of the psychoactive affects
of alcohol, whilst those who are primarily engaged in counseling
for alcohol problems are not trained to treat the underlying, or
outcome problems. It is by no means uncommon that within both
the NHS, voluntary and private agencies, those presenting with
anxiety disorders and alcohol misuse, are informed that they
need to address either their alcohol problem, or their anxiety
disorder, before ‘therapy’ can be offered.
The latter,
seemingly unhelpful attitude conceals an inescapable truth,
which is that treating one condition without the other is
unlikely to have lasting benefits. That sooner or later,
relapse into either or both conditions will occur.
Equally many so
called dedicated alcohol misuse agencies, decline to accept
clients
who have other
diagnosed mental disorders. With the increasing prevalence of
comorbidity this is resulting more people ‘slipping through the
net’, or receiving inadequate, and/or inappropriate
interventions.
As therapists who
have accepted that we have a ‘duty of care’ to our clients, I
suggest that we are lacking in the fulfilling of that duty, if
we fail to routinely screen for alcohol misuse in all anxiety
based problems. By screening I do not mean simply asking the
client whether or not he/she drinks, such a vague question will
elicit an equally vague answer. Equally using the politically
influenced recommended units per week will fail to produce
accurate information, if only because the units of measurement
referred to are based on the old imperial system of measurement
, whereas for some time pubs, bars and restaurants have been
dispersing metric units which are considerably larger.
Incidentally it may be of interest to note that the so called
safe number of units as indicated by the Dept of Health has
never been approved by either the British Medical Association,
or the Royal Institute of Psychiatrists.
There are a
variety of tests for assessing the presence of alcohol abuse
and/or dependence. The ‘tool’ I use was developed by the World
Health Organisation (WHO) and rejoices under the acronym of
AUDIT. This translates into Alcohol Use Disorders Identification
Test. It is freely downloadable together with full instructions
for use
www.who.int/substance abuse /PDF files/auditbro.pdf. A
companion document that you may also find useful is entitled ‘Brief
Interventions for hazardous and harmful drinking.’ This can
be downloaded from
www.who.int/substance abuse/PDF files/bimanbro.pdf.
AUDIT has been rated as being more clinically
more effective in assessing alcohol misuse and/or dependence
than blood tests (7)
At first sight it
may seem a difficult task to complete the questionnaire and
accurately interpret the results; applied diligence will be
rewarded. However if it appears to be too complicated, a
reasonably reliable result can be obtained by confining the
questions to 1,2,4,5 & 10. If the cumulative score is less than
5, there is no adverse influence from alcohol. A score of 5-10
indicates a harmful affect, whilst a score above 10 can mean
that dependency has, or is setting in. I must emphasis that the
scoring is indicative only. Should the score be a10 or above, a
specialist assessment may well be in your clients best
interests.
The outcome
is that you are now armed with information that allows you to
have a reasonably informed opinion of not only the presenting
problem, but also the extent to which alcohol abuse is
influencing it, or causing other problems. At this stage I
suggest that in order to fulfill our ‘duty of care’ obligation
the client needs to be made aware of the self harm that he/she
is imposing as the result of alcohol misuse. It is not unusual
for the client to be unaware of the damage that alcohol is
causing, and providing dependence has not
set in, can
be sufficient motivation for a change in lifestyle. However be
prepared for a negative reaction.
Many people who
abuse alcohol, particularly those who have become dependent on
it, are not only defensive about their habit, they are also
inclined to delude themselves that they drink because of their
problems, whereas it is more than likely that their problems are
the result of their drinking. This particular frame of mind is
what is referred to by some of those specialising in Addictive
Behaviours as the ‘Pre-Contemplation’ stage. (8) A
polite way of describing someone, with a clinically diagnosed
substance misuse problem, who is unwilling to acknowledge their
condition.
Having completed
the AUDIT and successfully interpreted the result, you are faced
with some tough choices.
-
If you are
not trained or qualified to deal with alcohol dependency or
misuse, do you refer the case to someone qualified to deal
with comorbidity?
-
Despite being
aware of the potential problems chose to ignore the alcohol
influence and address the presenting problem only?
-
Advise the
client that unless he/she is willing to seek help for the
alcohol problem, that any interventions you are qualified to
carry out in relation to the anxiety based presenting
problem are unlikely to have lasting benefit?
Insofar as the
first choice is concerned, given that the number of
agencies/individuals who are qualified are so relatively few, it
is likely to be more of a hypothetical situation than a reality.
The second choice
is so unethical that any therapist who values their integrity
would dismiss it.
The third choice
is of course the most ethical and honest. However it has the
potential disadvantage, that if the client is either unwilling
to acknowledge that there is a problem with alcohol, or is
unwilling to address that problem, but still wants to use your
therapeutic skills, what does one do? That is decision for each
individual to make according to their own standards.
If on the other
hand the client is willing to acknowledge and address the
alcohol problem, it would enhance our standing as professionals
who care, if we were able to provide our client with contact
details of community based Drug And Alcohol Action Teams.
Details of these should be in your local telephone book or
yellow pages. You may also find it beneficial to seek to
establish a relationship with the manager of your local team. If
your client would prefer a private consultation, you can find
details of registered drug and alcohol counselors on the
Federation of Drug and Alcohol Professionals
www.fdap.org.uk unfortunately, few if any of those listed
are qualified in hypnosis.
In addition we
should not overlook the extent of the help offered by Alcoholics
Anonymous. This fellowship which is sometimes maligned as a
cult, or mistakenly as a religion, has for more than 70 years
been helping those who have formed a dependency on alcohol.
Further, according to independent research carried out by
Harvard University it has been responsible for more successful
recoveries than all other agencies combined. Speaking for
myself, I urge all of my alcohol dependent clients to attend AA
meetings on a regular basis. Those that do so tend to achieve
recovery more quickly than others.
For those of you
who would like to acquire more knowledge about alcohol abuse,
and/or the basic skills in addressing this growing problem, some
community drug and alcohol action teams run training courses for
volunteers. If such is available in your area, it is as good a
route as any to get one’s ‘feet wet’. Such schemes
provide basic training in alcohol and drug awareness without the
expense of more academically based courses. They also provide
the unpaid opportunity of working alongside experienced
counselors. A realistic and economical way, of increasing your
skills and knowledge base, together with obtaining cpd credits.
Although I hope
that this article has shed some light on dealing with anxiety
based problems, that may be influenced, or caused by alcohol
misuse, it needs to be remembered that where dependency, or
addiction, has developed we have a threefold disease, of body,
mind and spirit. It follows that attempts to assist recovery
without the necessary training are not only unlikely to succeed,
but are potentially detrimental to the client. For further
clarification the author’s definition of addiction can be seen
on his website. It should be noted that there are other and
differing points of view on what constitutes addiction. In fact
there are almost as many theories of dependency as there are
brands of whiskey.
© Peter O’Loughlin.
The Eden Lodge Practice Beckenham. May 2005. Updated April 27th
2006.
www.edenlodgepractice.com
References.
1 Linford –Hughes, A. Potokar, J. & Nutt, D. ‘Treating anxiety
complicated by substance misuse.’ Advances in Psychiatric
Treatment. * 107-106 2002
2 Medical Students Guide to Alcohol misuse and Alcoholism.
Medical Council on Alcohol 1998.
3 Crome, L. B. “Psychiatric Disorder & Psychoactive Substance
Use Disorder: towards improved service provision”. Centre for
Research on Drugs & Health. London 1996.
4 Flanagan, M. An overview of comorbidity. Dept of Psychiatric
Medicine St. Georges Medical School, London. 2002.
5 Unell, Ira. “Risking our sanity”. Druglink September/October
1997. Institute for the Study of Drug Dependence: citing Ross,
H. et al “Sex differences in the prevalence of psychiatric
disorders in Alcohol & Drug patients”. British Journal of
Addiction: 1988: 83 1177-92.
6 Kaner, E. F. S. Heather, N. McAvoy, B. R. Loc k, C. A. &
Gilvary, E. Intervention for excessive alcohol consumption in
primary care: attitudes & practices of English General
Practitioners. Alcohol & Alcoholism. 1999: 34.4 559-566.
7 Simon Coulton, Prof. Colin Drummond, Dr. Darren James. Prof.
Christine Godfrey, Prof. J. Martin Bland. Prof. Timothy Peters.
British Medical Journal 2006;332:511-517 (4 March)
8 Di Clemente CC. Self Efficacy and Addictive Behaviours.
Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology. 4. 302 315. 1986.